Chrysobull proclaiming the Church of Russia a Patriarchate (1589): “Let the Patriarch of Moscow have as his head and authority the Apostolic Throne of the City of Constantine just as the other Patriarchs do.“We are neither in favor of the Ecumenical Patriarchate nor of the Patriarchate of Moscow. We stand for the truth, for legitimacy, and for the rights of Constantinople and of Russia as these were established through Local or Ecumenical Councils.
Sample Book Chapter
SECTION VI
4. Τhe Use of Oiconomia
Of the fifteen Orthodox Local Churches, only four (Constantinople, Alexandria, Cyprus, and Greece) recognize the autocephaly of Ukraine. However, the “Ukrainian question” could be resolved in the same manner in which the Bulgarian question was resolved; that is, autocephaly could be recognized by way of oiconomia.
The exercise of oiconomia is, after all, fully in keeping with the spirit and pastoral tradition of our Church.
Indicatively, for the sake of the Church’s unity, the ancient Patriarchates of Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem recognized, by way of oiconomia, the replacement of the Patriarchate of Moscow with a small synod instituted by Tsar Peter the Great. This unprecedented innovation is in no way comparable to the autocephaly of Ukraine.
Additional examples:
Moscow itself, making use of oiconomia, received the Uniate clergy of Ukraine into communion (March 9, 1946) without reordination. Likewise, Moscow received into communion (May 17, 2007) the schismatic body known as ROCOR (the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia).
In the United States, there are hundreds of thousands of Orthodox Christians (some estimate their number to be as high as approximately ten million). According to the 34th Canon of the Holy Apostles, there should be one Primate for all Orthodox Christians in that country. However, there are approximately ten Primates, one for each nationality. No Orthodox Church protests against this uncanonical situation. It is accepted by way of oiconomia, for the sake of peace within the Church.
And there are many other similar cases.
Why, then, should the autocephaly of Ukraine not also be recognized by way of oiconomia? Why should the schism and division within the Church of Ukraine continue? Why should the wound in the Body of Christ persist?
In an interview given on Christmas Day 2023 (new calendar, January 7, 2024), His Beatitude Patriarch Cyril of Moscow described the granting of autocephaly to the Church of Ukraine as “a great sin of Bartholomew.”
Yet we must bear in mind that the only Judge is the Lord.
He will judge whether Bartholomew committed a great sin. He will judge whether Cyril of Moscow handled the matter rightly.
He will judge whether Metropolitan Onuphrius acted correctly in refusing to participate in the Council of Kyiv (December 15, 2018). And He will judge every primate who did not do what was necessary to bring peace to the Church of Ukraine.
The wise and virtuous Archimandrite Ioel Giannakopoulos (Greece) was entrusted with speaking at the ninth-day memorial service (1961) for Metropolitan Chrysostomos I of Messenia. Father Ioel dared to say:
“Brothers! Where is the bishop now? Before Christ! And what did Christ say to him as soon as He saw him? ‘Here, I am the Shepherd! Cast away your staff, remove your mitre, remove your mantle, remove your pectoral crosses; stand naked before Me and give an account…!’”
If the judgment of God does not move us, then we, as shepherds, are dangerous to the salvation of the people.
Available on amazon.com
Leave a Reply